Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Reading Comprehension

Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) was an author, naturalist, and an important figure in the Literary Renaissance (of the nineteenth century) in America. He studied at Harvard but remained something of an outsider there, partly because of his temperament and also partly because, as the son of a small-town tradesman, he had a relatively modest background. Thoreau was influenced by both New England Puritanism and non-Western influences like Hindu mysticism. His reading of the Bhagvad Gita taught him that he should abstain from meat and alcohol, and live a simple life placing the needs of the intellect above material demands.

Thoreau was one of America’s most important free-thinkers and he communicated his ideas through essays and other works such as Walden, A Week on the Concord & Merrimack Rivers and Civil Disobedience. Mahatma Gandhi was impressed by Thoreau’s essay on Civil Disobedience and it later influenced his methods of offering Satyagraha against the British. The general message that Thoreau conveys is of the importance of throwing off the contradictions and complications of modern society in favor of honest reflection, clean living, and connection with the natural world.

This extract has been taken from Walden, Thoreau’s famous account of his radical experiment in living. For over a year, Thoreau lived alone in the woods in a simple cabin near Walden Pond. Here, Thoreau was sufficiently inspired to reflect on society and human nature itself.


"If I should attempt to tell how I have desired to spend my life in years past, it would probably surprise those of my readers who are somewhat acquainted with its actual history; it would certainly astonish those who know nothing about it. I will only hint at some of the enterprises which I have cherished.

In any weather, at any hour of the day or night, I have been anxious to improve the nick of time, and notch it on my stick too; to stand on the meeting of two eternities, the past and future, which is precisely the present moment; to toe that line. You will pardon some obscurities, for there are more secrets in my trade than in most men's, and yet not voluntarily kept, but inseparable from its very nature. I would gladly tell all that I know about it, and never paint "No Admittance" on my gate.

I long ago lost a hound, a bay horse, and a turtle dove, and am still on their trail. Many are the travellers I have spoken concerning them, describing their tracks and what calls they answered to. I have met one or two who had heard the hound, and the tramp of the horse, and even seen the dove disappear behind a cloud, and they seemed as anxious to recover them as if they had lost them themselves.

To anticipate, not the sunrise and the dawn merely, but, if possible, Nature herself! How many mornings, summer and winter, before yet any neighbor was stirring about his business, have I been about mine! No doubt, many of my townsmen have met me returning from this enterprise, farmers starting for Boston in the twilight, or woodchoppers going to their work. It is true, I never assisted the sun materially in his rising, but, doubt not, it was of the last importance only to be present at it.

So many autumn, ay, and winter days, spent outside the town, trying to hear what was in the wind, to hear and carry it express! I well-nigh sunk all my capital in it, and lost my own breath into the bargain, running in the face of it. If it had concerned either of the political parties, depend upon it, it would have appeared in the Gazette with the earliest intelligence. At other times watching from the observatory of some cliff or tree, to telegraph any new arrival; or waiting at evening on the hill-tops for the sky to fall, that I might catch something, though I never caught much, and that, manna-wise, would dissolve again in the sun.

For a long time I was reporter to a journal, of no very wide circulation, whose editor has never yet seen fit to print the bulk of my contributions, and, as is too common with writers, I got only my labor for my pains. However, in this case my pains were their own reward.

For many years I was self-appointed inspector of snow-storms and rain-storms, and did my duty faithfully; surveyor, if not of highways, then of forest paths and all across-lot routes, keeping them open, and ravines bridged and passable at all seasons, where the public heel had testified to their utility.

I have looked after the wild stock of the town, which give a faithful herdsman a good deal of trouble by leaping fences; and I have had an eye to the unfrequented nooks and corners of the farm; though I did not always know whether Jonas or Solomon worked in a particular field to-day; that was none of my business. I have watered the red huckleberry, the sand cherry and the nettle-tree, the red pine and the black ash, the white grape and the yellow violet, which might have withered else in dry seasons.

In short, I went on thus for a long time (I may say it without boasting), faithfully minding my business, till it became more and more evident that my townsmen would not after all admit me into the list of town officers, nor make my place a sinecure with a moderate allowance. My accounts, which I can swear to have kept faithfully, I have, indeed, never got audited, still less accepted, still less paid and settled. However, I have not set my heart on that.

Not long since, a strolling Indian went to sell baskets at the house of a well-known lawyer in my neighborhood. "Do you wish to buy any baskets?" he asked. "No, we do not want any," was the reply. "What!" exclaimed the Indian as he went out the gate, "do you mean to starve us?" Having seen his industrious white neighbors so well off -- that the lawyer had only to weave arguments, and, by some magic, wealth and standing followed -- he had said to himself: I will go into business; I will weave baskets; it is a thing which I can do. Thinking that when he had made the baskets he would have done his part, and then it would be the white man's to buy them. He had not discovered that it was necessary for him to make it worth the other's while to buy them, or at least make him think that it was so, or to make something else which it would be worth his while to buy. I too had woven a kind of basket of a delicate texture, but I had not made it worth any one's while to buy them.

Yet not the less, in my case, did I think it worth my while to weave them, and instead of studying how to make it worth men's while to buy my baskets, I studied rather how to avoid the necessity of selling them. The life which men praise and regard as successful is but one kind. Why should we exaggerate any one kind at the expense of the others?"


Please read and write down your understanding of the passage in the comments. This will enable us to discuss the same. The more the comments the better would be the learning.


Until tomorrow,

Ciao

6 comments:

  1. Gautam,
    This is a really heavy one !

    The gist of the passage being," Henry Thoreau has decided to give the readers a peek into his life in terms of what he has done for a living.Henry sounds conservative giving really vague and closed descriptions of his experiences.He talks about being with the Met Dept,with a journal as a reporter and included a few problems in his job life. Towards the end he tried to give a his idea as to how a buisness must be done "

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really din understand this passage:but still giving a try :p

    henry thoreau is this very philosophical man,and in this passage talks about his life experience,and different kind of people he meets.he talk about his work life also;how not satisfying and unfair its has been.also he talks about how a business has to be done.

    thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This paragraph is a little difficult to comprehend but gave it a try

    Initially the author describes about his nature , he explains that everyone is busy about his/her businessand has forgot nature. Then he elaborates about his job and says he got labor for his pains and still he enjoys it.Henry Thoreau believes in simplicity and explains it further by giving examples of basket maker.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I read through twice,esp last 3 paras...The idea he gave is that different people have different thoughts n diff actions,and you cant actually compare success of two people working in 2 different fields.The author was content his own ways in his own fields,but others neednt term him successful....

    ReplyDelete
  5. well...kinda seem to have gotten a hang of it...The author wants to be accepted..wants to have a postion in the world and does many things(which hes given examples of) even wen he was not required to do...to get some recognition but at the same time he dusnt do enough to convince other that he deserves the postion...he gives the example of the baster maker for this reason...The author has done his job..he has done alot of things he wasnt required to...and thinks he deserves the perks that come along with it..but what he has not done is convice other of his work and convince others he deserves the 'position and acceptance' he dearly covets...basically....hes all work and no marketing..
    moral of the story: Market your hard work for other to buy..
    what say Gautam???

    ReplyDelete
  6. well this was a really difficult one i believe. didn't understand quite a lot of things but here's a try....... the author describes his life in the woods where he tried to do various things so as to gain acceptance in the society maybe.... but he has come to understand that the present day parameters which define success may not be applicable to all kinds of success i.e he believes that success as it seen by the majority is of just one kind and there can be many others. he gives us the example of the Indian basket maker who doesn't understand the necessity to create a need for his product or create a product for an existing need and is thus not successful.

    ReplyDelete